← All cases

Hemorrhoid embolization for chronic grade 3 bleeding

A man in his 30s had chronic rectal bleeding from grade 3 internal hemorrhoids and a haemoglobin below 10 g/dL. The superior rectal artery branches were embolized with a combination of microsphere particles and coils; at one month the bleeding had decreased and the haemoglobin had risen. Longer-term follow-up is a separate question.

Continuous bleeding and a falling haemoglobin

A man in his 30s presented with chronic, continuous rectal bleeding from grade 3 internal hemorrhoids. The ongoing blood loss had brought his haemoglobin below 10 g/dL.

He was looking for a solution that did not involve surgery. Taken together, the clinical assessment and the available findings suggested he was a candidate for superior rectal artery embolization.

The superior rectal artery branches feeding the hemorrhoids on DSA

Angiography of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) showed the superior rectal artery and the terminal branches supplying the hemorrhoidal cushions. Superselective DSA runs set out the distribution of the arterial branches to be treated.

On the final check images the target superior rectal artery branches were closed, while the non-target arterial branches were preserved.

A catheter-based option for a patient who did not want surgery

In grade 3 internal hemorrhoids the choice of treatment weighs the severity of the bleeding, prolapse, anaemia, coexisting conditions and the patient's own preference together. Here the fact that continuous bleeding had driven the haemoglobin down made the need for treatment clear.

Because he did not want surgery, superior rectal artery embolization — which aims to reduce the arterial inflow to the hemorrhoids through a catheter — was planned as a minimally invasive option.

Particle and coil embolization through a 5F femoral access

The procedure began with a 5F sheath in the femoral artery. The inferior mesenteric artery was catheterised first; a microcatheter was then advanced superselectively into the superior rectal artery and the branches feeding the hemorrhoids.

The target branches were embolized first with microsphere particles and then with coils. The procedure was ended once a final check angiogram confirmed that each separately treated branch was closed and that the non-target arterial circulation was preserved.

Same-day discharge, less bleeding at one month

The patient was observed for four to five hours after the procedure and discharged the same day.

At the one-month review there was a clear reduction in the amount of bleeding and a rise in haemoglobin. These findings were consistent with an early clinical and laboratory response; longer follow-up matters for judging whether the bleeding control lasts.

What this case teaches

Chronic hemorrhoidal bleeding does more than reduce quality of life: it can also drive the haemoglobin down. Reading the change in haemoglobin alongside what the patient reports about the bleeding therefore gives a more objective picture of the response to treatment.

In this case, after superselective embolization of the superior rectal artery branches with microsphere particles and coils, one month brought both less bleeding and a higher haemoglobin.

What this means for the patient

Superior rectal artery embolization is a catheter-based option that aims to reduce hemorrhoidal bleeding in suitable patients without an incision.

It is not the only option for everyone with grade 3 hemorrhoids. The degree of prolapse, the severity of the bleeding, anaemia, previous treatments and the patient's own preferences all belong in a joint proctology and interventional radiology assessment.

Risks and alternatives

Possible risks

Bleeding or bruising at the catheter site may occur. Rectal ulceration or reduced blood supply to the bowel are important potential harms; bleeding may persist and another treatment may be needed.

Other options

Fibre, stool-softening measures and medicines, rubber-band ligation or other office procedures, and surgery when indicated. Rectal bleeding needs assessment for other causes.

NICE considers the evidence on safety and benefit insufficient and recommends this procedure only in a research setting in the UK. Any proposal here needs an individual discussion of this uncertainty.

Clinical source: NICE

This is one patient. Imaging is anonymised and published with that patient’s written consent. Individual results vary, and nothing here is a prediction of your own outcome or a substitute for a consultation.

How Hemorrhoid Embolization works  →

Send your imaging for a medical review

Read personally by Dr. Pıçak. A written answer within 48 hours.